In the NEWS: Is Hemoglobinuria an Underused Marker of Active IgA Nephropathy?

Hematuria is one of the defining clinical features of IgA nephropathy (IgAN), yet contemporary risk assessment remains largely centered on proteinuria and eGFR. Vargas-Brochero and colleagues asked an important question: can the simple presence of blood on urinalysis provide information about ongoing glomerular inflammation?

In this multicenter retrospective study, investigators evaluated 441 patients with biopsy-proven IgAN from four international cohorts between 2015 and 2025. Urinary hemoglobin by dipstick, microscopic hematuria, and proteinuria obtained around the time of biopsy were compared with individual components of the Oxford MEST-C classification.

The findings were striking. Dipstick hemoglobinuria was associated with active inflammatory lesions, including mesangial hypercellularity (M1; OR 1.77), endocapillary hypercellularity (E1; OR 1.75), and crescents (C1/C2; OR 1.57). Microscopic hematuria showed similar, although generally weaker, associations. For the composite of M1, E1, and/or C1/C2 lesions, hemoglobinuria demonstrated the strongest association (OR 2.28), compared with microscopic hematuria (OR 1.36) and proteinuria (OR 1.20).

Importantly, hemoglobinuria and microscopic hematuria were not associated with chronic histologic damage, whereas proteinuria correlated with tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (T1/T2). This distinction suggests that these urinary biomarkers may be capturing different aspects of IgAN biology: hematuria reflecting active glomerular inflammation and proteinuria reflecting, at least partly, accumulated structural injury.

The clinical takeaway is refreshingly simple: don’t ignore the blood on the dipstick. In an era increasingly focused on disease activity and targeted therapies in IgAN, inexpensive and readily available hemoglobinuria may provide complementary information beyond proteinuria and eGFR when assessing ongoing disease activity.

Read the Kidney International article

KDIGO updates another IgAN guideline- 2026

 

Since the 2025 IgA nephropathy (IgAN) guideline update, three major therapies have reshaped the treatment landscape. Atrasentan, an endothelin A receptor antagonist, received accelerated approval for patients at high risk of progression (uPCR ≥1.5 g/g) based on the ALIGN trial. Added on top of RAS inhibition, it achieved a 38.1% reduction in proteinuria versus 3.1% with placebo, a significant 36.1% treatment difference.

Later in 2025, sibeprenlimab, an anti-APRIL monoclonal antibody targeting B-cell–mediated IgA production, was approved following the VISIONARY trial. It demonstrated a 50.2% reduction in proteinuria versus a 2.1% increase with placebo (difference 51.2%). Importantly, it also showed robust biologic effects, reducing pathogenic Gd-IgA1 by ~70% along with significant reductions in total IgA, IgM, and IgG.

Most recently, iptacopan, a complement factor B inhibitor, showed strong long-term outcomes. Over two years, it significantly slowed eGFR decline and reduced kidney failure events (HR 0.57), with an overall safety profile similar to placebo, though with higher rates of serious infections.

Together, these therapies target distinct pathways—hemodynamic, immunologic, and complement—marking a new era of mechanism-driven IgAN treatment.

Here is the most recent KDIGO update
Above cartoon was created using AI for illustrating a battle of the new class of agents for IgAN treatment

In the NEWS: Unmasking PGNMID: Is it Truly Monoclonal, or Are We Misclassifying Kidney Disease?

 

    Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits (PGNMID) is a severe kidney disease, traditionally classified under Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance (MGRS). This classification implies that the kidney damage is caused by a single, abnormal B-cell or plasma cell clone producing a "monoclonal" antibody. However, a long-standing puzzle in nephrology has been the surprisingly low rate at which these supposed disease-causing clones are actually detected in PGNMID patients. This discrepancy has fueled a debate: is PGNMID always truly monoclonal, or are we sometimes misattributing its cause?

    A recent study published in Kidney International, led by Javaugue, Pascal, and colleagues, delves into this question using advanced diagnostic tools. They analyzed 56 PGNMID patients, employing highly sensitive immunoglobulin repertoire sequencing (RACE-RepSeq) on bone marrow samples and specialized immunofluorescence on kidney biopsies to scrutinize the nature of the deposited immunoglobulins. The findings challenge conventional understanding. Only 23% of the patients had a detectable bone marrow clone consistent with their kidney deposits. The predominant subtype, PGNMID-IgG3, accounted for 73% of cases and was the main reason for the low clone detection rate; a mere 9.8% of these IgG3 cases showed a clonal B-cell proliferation. 

Crucially, in clone-negative PGNMID-IgG3 kappa patients, kidney biopsies revealed that the immunoglobulin deposits were *oligoclonal* or *polyclonal*, not truly monoclonal as the "monotypic" appearance on standard immunofluorescence might suggest.

Patients with clone-negative PGNMID showed distinct characteristics compared to clone-positive patients. Although diagnosed younger, they presented with more severe symptoms at diagnosis, including significantly higher proteinuria, but, interestingly, showed a lower prevalence of hypocomplementemia. Since IgG3 is the most frequent isotype and is known to be highly effective to bind and activate complement components, this finding is somehow surprising. However, compared to clone-positive patients with an elevated circulating monoclonal Ig, serum IgG3 levels in this subgroup remain normal which could explain the absence of hypocomplementemia. The study also hinted at potential infectious triggers in clone-negative cases, observing increased IgG1 and highly mutated light chain repertoires.

This research strongly suggests that PGNMID is a heterogeneous condition. The authors conclude that most PGNMID-IgG3 cases are driven by oligoclonal or polyclonal IgG3 production and do not arise from an underlying monoclonal B-cell disorder. They propose that such cases should no longer be classified as MGRS, and suggest the term "proliferative glomerulonephritis with monotypic deposits" to accurately reflect their origin. This distinction is critical, as it has profound implications for how these patients are diagnosed and, ultimately, treated. The study underscores the power of advanced molecular techniques in refining our understanding and management of complex kidney diseases.

In the News: B cell and plasma cell therapies in Glomerular Diseases

Glomerular diseases often result from loss of immune tolerance, leading to the production of autoantibodies by plasmablasts/plasma cells. Besides secreting antibodies, B cells contribute to T cell activation through antigen presentation and the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Standard immunosuppression works broadly but has many side effects, and many patients remain refractory. Thus, there is growing interest in therapies that more precisely target B cells and plasma cells. This review in JASN 2025 really is a very nicely done summary of the topic. 

B cells develop through naïve, activated, memory, plasmablast, to plasma cell stages. Memory B cells and long-lived plasma cells are particularly important in sustaining autoantibody production. 

Differential expression of surface markers (e.g. CD20 present on many B cells but lost in plasma cells) and dependency on survival signals (such as BAFF, APRIL) define what makes some cells resistant to certain therapies. 

Some challenges are that some plasma cell populations are long-lived and reside in protected niches (e.g. bone marrow), making them resistant to many therapies. Risk of depleting beneficial B cell subsets (e.g. those with regulatory functions). Heterogeneity of disease: different glomerular diseases (IgA nephropathy, lupus nephritis, membranous nephropathy, vasculitis etc.) have varying dependence on B cells vs plasma cells.

Therapies targeting B cells and plasma cells have shown promise in trials for various glomerular diseases. See the table below. Novel tools (like CAR-T, bispecifics) may help overcome resistance and target plasma cells more effectively.

Lupus Nephritis has trials ongoing with BAFF inhibition, Anti CD20+BAFF, BTK inhibitor, Anti CD38, CAR-T and bispecifics.  ANCA vasculitis has trials ongoing in Anti CD20 with BAFF-APRIL, and CAR-T.  Membranous Nephropathy has trials ongoing in anti-CD-20, BAFF, BTK inhibitors and Anti CD-38.  MCD/FSGS has trials ongoing in Anti CD-20 and BTK inhibitors. IgAN has trials in APRIL, APRIL+BAFF, Anti CD38 and CAR-T as well. 

Table: Therapies Targeting B-Cell and Plasma Cell Lineages in Glomerular Disease

Target / Stage	Examples of Therapeutics	Notes
Naïve / Mature B Cells	Anti-CD20 mAbs (rituximab, obinutuzumab, ofatumumab)	Deplete most circulating B cells, but not plasma cells
B Cell Survival Signals	BAFF inhibitors (belimumab), BAFF/APRIL dual inhibitors (telitacicept)	Block trophic support for B cells and plasmablasts
BCR Signaling	BTK inhibitors (ibrutinib, acalabrutinib)	Reduce activation and differentiation
Plasmablasts / Short-lived PCs	Proteasome inhibitors (bortezomib, carfilzomib)	Induce apoptosis of antibody-secreting plasmablasts
Long-lived Plasma Cells	Anti-CD38 mAbs (daratumumab, isatuximab); anti-BCMA agents	Direct depletion, even in bone marrow niches
Novel Cellular Immunotherapy	CAR-T cells (anti-CD19, anti-BCMA); bispecific T-cell engagers	Potent but experimental; risk of profound immunosuppression
Regulatory B Cells (Bregs)	Indirectly affected by the above agents	Their depletion may worsen immune dysregulation—needs careful monitoring

Concept Map: How I treat Glomerular Diseases in the Older patients

 

Based on CJASN article published in 2025

In the News: Dense Deposit Disease and ApoE- the new connection

C3 glomerulopathy arises from irregularities in the alternative pathway of complement. It manifests as two types: C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN) and dense deposit disease (DDD), identifiable by bright C3 staining in the glomeruli under immunofluorescence. EM distinguishes DDD by dense deposits along the glomerular basement membranes, contrasting with non-dense deposits in C3GN. A fascinating new study investigating 12 cases each of DDD, C3GN, and pretransplant kidney controls, laser microdissection (LCM) followed by mass spectrometry (MS) revealed a significant accumulation of complement proteins and regulatory factors in both C3GN and DDD compared to controls. Notably, DDD exhibited a much higher concentration of C5-9 and apolipoprotein E (ApoE) compared to C3GN. 

Image courtesy: pathologyoutlines.com 

ApoE staining aligned with dense deposit patterns in DDD but not in C3GN or controls, validated in 31 C3G cases. This is fascinating as perhaps ApoE staining may serve as a diagnostic tool for DDD, particularly when EM is unavailable, as it reflects the enriched presence of ApoE in dense deposits, distinguishing DDD from C3GN.

ApoE is a 34 kDa lipoprotein, that facilitates lipid transportation by binding to lipids. As we are aware, in various diseases like atherosclerosis, Alzheimer’s, and amyloidosis, ApoE plays pivotal roles in plaque formation and fibril assembly. Additionally, I learnt that it is also detected in fibrillary glomerulonephritis, immunotactoid glomerulonephritis, and monoclonal Ig deposition disease, potentially acting as a scaffolding protein. While its accumulation is significant in DDD, it's also found in other diseases but in lesser amounts. Staining for ApoE aids in diagnosing DDD alongside proliferative glomerulonephritis and bright C3 staining. Kidney accumulation of ApoE occurs predominantly in lipoprotein glomerulopathy and ApoE-related glomerulopathies. ApoE interacts with complement factors, inhibiting inflammation and regulating complement pathways. Moreover, it's a component of age-related macular degeneration but hasn't been previously identified in DDD dense deposits. This study suggests ApoE binds to heparan sulfate in the glomerular basement membrane, potentially acting as a chaperone for C5-9 proteins, contributing to dense deposit formation. Further investigation is warranted to confirm ApoE's interaction with C5-9 proteins and potential treatment strategies as a result. Kudos to the authors for making this connection. 

CONSULT ROUNDS: NELL-1 MEMBRANOUS NEPHROPATHY

 After PLA2R, NELL-1 related membranous nephropathy(MN) seems to be the second most common MN.  Initially, the studies had pointed towards a cancer-related cause for NELL-1 MN. In recent years and most recently, 2 papers published in 2024 highlight the role of complementary medications.  

A study from India investigates the clinical outcomes of NELL1-associated MN compared to unidentified antigen-associated MN. Among 46 NELL1 and 36 unidentified antigen-associated MN patients, a significant history of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use was noted particularly in the NELL1 group. NELL1-associated MN patients showed a lesser need for immunosuppression, attributed partly to CAM intake, with similar remission rates observed in both groups. The study highlights the distinct clinical features of NELL1-associated MN, including its association with CAM, and suggests a potential for spontaneous remission in these patients. Despite limitations like small sample size and short follow-up, findings indicate CAM's role in NELL1-associated MN and underscore the need for further research in this entity. 

A study spanning three institutions in the USA reviewed NELL1 associated MN cases, revealing that 53% of the 70 patients were male, with a median age of 66 and proteinuria of 5.9 grams/day. Associations included lipoic acid (36%), heavy NSAID use (27%), autoimmune diseases (23%), and malignancy (33%). At a median 11-month follow-up, 72% achieved remission, notably 91% in lipoic acid-associated cases with ≥6 months follow-up. Primary NELL1 MN and greater tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis predicted lower remission rates, while lipoic acid use correlated with higher complete remission rates, suggesting its discontinuation as a primary treatment strategy.

I have revised my concept map for NELL-1 MN based on this study to really highlight the CAM and Lipoic acid components. ( created using bio-render).

Topic Discussion: Atypical anti GBM disease

 

We are aware that circulating anti-GBM antibodies are directly pathogenic in anti-GBM disease. However, about 10% of patients with anti-GBM disease do not have circulating anti- GBM antibodies.

Atypical anti-GBM disease is considered when patients have linear IgG deposition along the glomerular basement membrane without anti-GBM antibodies in the circulation.

Atypical anti-GBM disease comprises 8% to 12% of all anti-GBM disease cases. About 2% to 8% of patients with anti-GBM disease have negative serology despite rigorous testing.

Pathogenesis:

(1)different composition of antigen/epitope: a)Antibodies against the NC1 domain of other alpha chains like alpha1, alpha4, or alpha5 chains of type IV collagen or to the NC1 domain of alpha345 hexamers, b)Linear epitopes of the collagenous domain, or C)entactin

(2)different affinity of antibodies: a) high-affinity autoantibodies trapped in the kidneys and present with low titer in circulation, or (b)Autoantibodies could also have a low affinity for the substrate in the assay

(3) different types of antibody: a). the dominance of different IgG subclass such as IgG4 or IgG1 and frequent presence of IgG2, b) presence of IgA or IgM dominance which is not exactly atypical anti-GBM diseases in terms of clinical/pathological presentation

Pathology: (i) Lack diffuse crescentic and necrotizing glomerulonephritis, (ii). Light microscopy heterogenous: mesangial and/or endocapillary proliferative GN, MPGN, FSGS, mesangial sclerosis; and glomerular endothelial changes resembling TMA are common

Monotypic atypical anti-GBM disease: Monotypic Ig deposits along the GBM are increasingly observed to cause a disease pattern similar to atypical anti-GBM. Needs further study to confirm if it is a form of MGRS?

Prognosis: Kidney dysfunction is usually milder and evolves slower than classic anti-GBM disease; however, presentation as RPGN has also been reported. Proteinuria and nephrotic syndrome are more frequent than classic anti-GBM disease.

Treatment: is individualized and typically consists of immunosuppressive agents used to treat classic anti-GBM disease or monotherapy with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blockers

Check out this review

Golden Era in therapeutics for IgA Nephropathy

Just in the last 1 year, we have two new drugs being approved for IgA Nephropathy. In addition, we have seen an emergence in using SGLT2i perhaps in IgAN and other GNs. The DAPA-CKD trial IgAN patients were evaluated and the use of dapagliflozin was superior than placebo. The EMPA-Kidney had close to 800 IgAN patients, we shall await those results soon.

MMF has just made a come back with a recent Chinese study showing some promise in a RCT. 

Finally, a targeted release steroid called budesonide has been FDA approved. This was developed to deliver the active drug in the distal ileum, where the Peyer's patches are -- the likely culprit where a large amount of galactose deficient IgA is made. The data was just published in KI.

And finally, the first single molecule Dual Endothelin Angiotensin Receptor Antagonist (DEARA) approved for use in patients with IgAN. The data is not published yet in a journal.

There are still ongoing trials of other DEARAs, and complement inhibitors, APRIL inhibitors for IgAN. In my opinion, the future of treatment of IgAN can be perhaps summarized in the below figure: ( created using biorender.com)

NELL-1 Membranous Nephropathy- Concept Map

 

This is an inspired figure from Sethi's amazing review in CKJ. 

This figure is a summary of the various secondary causes of NELL-1 MN that have been described. 
( keeping in mind that primary NELL-1 MN without a secondary cause still is the most common)

GN Chat- a new initiative

 

The Glomerular Center of Northwell now runs a special monthly GN chat to discuss fun and interesting case based discussions of glomerular disease topics. This is on 3rd Tuesday of each month at 8AM EST

Register in advance for this meeting:

https://northwell.zoom.us/meeting/register/tJElf-iqqzgoE9edbml-AI1dNR07Q1LQOL-m 

After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting.

Come learn GN in a coffee style manner with experts in the field- Purva Sharma, Jordan Rosenstock and Kenar Jhaveri

New Combined Glomerular Diseases and Onco-Nephrology Fellowship at Northwell

Northwell Nephrology is offering both a traditional two year general nephrology fellowship as well as a new fellowship that includes a third year fellowship specializing in glomerular diseases and onconephrology. The traditional two year fellowship can be applied for through this link

The new expanded third year is through the prestigious Northwell Nephrology Galdi Fellowship in Onconephrology and Glomerular Diseases. This fellowship offer a year of intensive training in these two important subject areas.

A candidate for the Galdi Fellowship will have completed internal medicine residency training, a general nephrology fellowship and demonstrate the highest level of performance and scientific and clinical potential. Candidates for the Galdi Fellowship would be carefully vetted based upon academic and other indications suggesting that advanced training as a Galdi Fellow would enable their ability to become one of a select few international leaders in glomerular diseases and onco-nephrology. The Galdi Fellowship will last for one academic calendar (July through June) year.  A new fellow will be recruited each year.

Training in glomerular kidney diseases is through the Northwell Nephrology Center for Glomerular Diseases directed by Drs. Kenar Jhaveri and Purva Sharma. The fellow will work in the Glomerular Disease Center and be exposed to all aspects of glomerular disease management including a rotation with Division of Rheumatology for extra training in SLE and ANCA vasculitis. The fellow will also have the opportunity to participate in ongoing clinical trials in glomerulonephritis at the Glomerular Disease Center. 

Onconephrology overlaps to an extent with glomerular diseases. Fellows gain experience both in the clinic and hospital with world renowned leaders Rimda Wanchoo and Kenar Jhaveri. Rotations will also include with hematology and oncology teams dealing with multiple myeloma, renal cell cancer and bone marrow transplant services. In addition, the fellow will have rotations with our nephropathologists as well.

 Currently we are accepting applications from current nephrology fellows or recent graduates for the Galdi Fellowship for start date of July 2023. In addition we are accepting applications from internal medicine residents for the general nephrology fellowship starting July, 2023 with a third year Galdi fellowship starting in July, 2025.

For inquiries regarding the advanced fellowship program, please email Dr. Kenar Jhaveri at kjhaveri@northwell.edu 

          Galdi fellowship website 

The application should include
1.      CV of the applicant
2.      Two recommendation letters (one must be from the Nephrology Program Director of Chief)
3.      A Personal Statement on the reasons for joining this fellowship.

Opinion- Renal Thrombotic Microangiopathy?- Should we be calling it Renal Limited Endothelial injury or Endothelial Injury of Renal Significance

Thrombotic Microangiopathy- what’s in a name?

This is a common conversation:

“ The kidney biopsy confirms TMA”.  Great- we should ask hematology to help treat..
Hematology—“ but there are no signs of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia.. no schistocytes on smear—no need to treat”

Another conversation

“ The kidney biopsy confirms TMA”.  But there are no micro thrombi on the kidney biopsy. This is likely from HTN—treat the HTN.  “ but the patient has a complement factor H mutation..”.. hmm..

The presentation of TMA can be as mild as HTN only, or AKI on CKD or HTN with CKD or nephritic syndrome or nephrotic syndrome or just nephrotic range proteinuria with AKI. The clinical presentation is very varied. I have seen it all.

The problem with TMA starts with the nomenclature.  Personally, I have a problem with a series of diseases in the kidney called TMA—some have angiopathy only, some have endotheliosis, some have both and some have additional microthrombi but at the end we call all of them TMA.

Most of TMA cases are without thrombosis, only rarely would you see true thrombi.  Frank thrombosis is more common in (catastrophic) APLAS associated TMA in the kidney.

Some TMA tends to be more glomerular  classically in pregnancy related, for example, with endothelial cell swelling = endotheliosis).  And some TMA tends to be more arterial (thrombotic angiopathy rather than microangiopathy). Or we might be catching them at various points in time. A continuous process..

 In my opinion, a better terminology of this entity should be Renal limited endothelial injury or endothelial injury of renal significance. Renal limited TMA without systemic findings is common-- very common than we think and we may be missing to treat as most likely don't get a renal biopsy. Systemic findings of MAHA or other endothelial injury are not required. In several cases- the injury is purely renal limited.  

The pathology is also variable and hence should be considered to be defined perhaps with what is noted on it. 

Endothelial injury with angiopathy
Endothelial injury with micro thrombi
Endothelial injury with endotheliosis predominant

The cause of the injury than can be defined better based on history of the patient and then divided into categories as per the syndromes of TMA or better called “endothelial injury”- such as ADAMTS13 mediated, complement mediated, Drug induced ( immune vs toxic), Shiga toxin mediated, metabolism mediated, coagulation mediated and so forth. This figure is from the classic NEJM article by George et al in 2014.

As we learn more about renal endothelial injury, perhaps a better practical terminology may be useful in defining the disease to help clinicians guide the treatment plan.

Topic Discussion: Ever changing FSGS classifications

FSGS is a tough diagnosis and often confusing to the Nephrologist. Classifications in FSGS also have been very confusing and challenging. Several years ago, the pathology based classification had entered all textbooks. 

Is this classification clinically useful? Not sure it is to most nephrologists? If I have a tip variant FSGS, or Perihilar, does it tell me anything re the cause and outcome? Maybe- but mostly not.

In 2007, there was a movement towards changing the concept to more podocytopathy based. ( see below- recreated using biorender). 

Not sure if this is useful either but it really asked a fundamental question re how we are seeing these spectrum of diseases we term FSGS.

The most useful to me personally is classifying the FSGS presentation into 

1) primary vs secondary cause

2) nephrotic syndrome vs nephrotic range proteinuria

While not 100% in most cases, nephrotic syndrome and FSGS usually is going to have a primary cause( sparing some genetic causes and viruses). In addition, what is also helpful from a pathology standpoint is not the LM, but the EM-- 

3) Is there diffuse or partial foot process effacement?- Usually the former responds to treatment better with steroids or other immunosuppression and later is more likely a secondary cause. It may also aid in looking for a secondary cause.

This figure from a JASN paper by De Vriese et al is very helpful indeed. 

So FSGS really should be described more in terms of primary vs secondary causes and EM findings to help in treatment decisions. Classically, your "permeability or immune mediated" FSGS should respond to treatment and would fit under nephrotic syndrome, diffuse foot process effacement and classically your primary FSGS.  Secondary FSGS from various causes like low nephron mass, obesity, viral , meds- all classically would have nephrotic range proteinuria and sporadic foot process effacement on EM. That being said, some genetic causes of FSGS would be seen to have diffuse foot process effacement as well. Genetic FSGS is an important one to keep in mind and screening for genetic causes should be done: young patient, family hx, resistant to treatment, aiding in post transplant risk. etc.

KDIGO GN 2021 guidelines summarize this nicely

APOL-1 plays an important cause and role here and this slide can summarize the primary and the second hit concept with APOL-1 related FSGS

We should not forget --nonspecific scarring on renal biopsies. FSGS should also be differentiated from focal segmental scarring that develops in immune-mediated GN (e.g., Membranous Nephropathy, IgA Neph, ANCA-associated GN, and lupus nephritis) as a result of post-inflammatory scarring of necrotizing or proliferative lesions. This happens a lot and this should not be treated as FSGS. 

In summary, FSGS has come a long way and finally we are seeing some changes in the way we are describing it.. Best 3 ways to categorize FSGS is clinically and EM based.

1. Primary vs Secondary

2. Nephrotic syndrome vs nephrotic range proteinuria

3. Diffuse foot process effacement vs partial foot process effacement 

KDIGO 2021- GN Management Guidelines: MPGN

 The recent KDIGO guidelines are here

One of the most important changes is getting rid of the MPGN1, 2 and 3 classification and using the novel pathophysiology based classification and recognizing that MPGN is a pattern of injury

The diagnosis of the C3GN and DDD is tough and requires the extensive assays and testing on complement cascade.

Treatment really depends on the cause.

For idiopathic causes of MPGN pattern of injury, consider a limited course of steroids
For RPGN of idiopathic cause, steroids + cyclophosphamide
For MPGN with low GFR< 30, supportive treatment only

For C3GN, and no signs of MGRS, and failed MMF and steroids, eculizumab should be considered
 

KDIGO 2021- GN Management Guidelines: Infection associated GN

The recent KDIGO update 2021

Bacterial infection associated GN- 4 main types

Post infectious GN
Shunt nephritis
Endocarditis associated GN
IgA dominant infection related GN

All 4 of them usually have low complement levels.  No RCT for treatment
Antibiotics or surgical treatment for respective infections

Viral infection associated GN- 

Hep B- Hep B DNA >2000 IU/ml, need treatment with anti Hep B agent and no avoid immunosuppressive agents as can accelerate the viral infection.

HIV disease: HAART therapy is recommended for all HIVAN and HIVICK diseases.

Hep C associated GN:  A kidney biopsy should be performed in HCV-positive patients with clinical evidence of glomerular disease. Patients with mild or moderate forms of HCV-associated GN with stable kidney function and/or non-nephrotic proteinuria should be managed first with a DAA regimen. Patients with severe cryoglobulinemia or severe glomerular disease induced by HCV (i.e., nephrotic proteinuria or rapidly progressive kidney failure) should be treated with immunosuppressive agents (generally with rituximab as the first-line agent) and/or plasma exchange in addition to DAA therapies. Patients with HCV-related glomerular disease who do not respond to or are intolerant of antiviral treatment should also be treated with immunosuppressive agents.

KDIGO 2021- GN Management Guidelines: FSGS

 FSGS has been the waste basket diagnosis for years. KDIGO finally has adopted the primary vs secondary FSGS way of thinking to make it easier to treat FSGS and diagnose the 99% of the secondary causes. Check out these amazing figures from the supplement

Treatment wise:  If primary FSGS- steroids 1mg/kg dosing for 4 weeks and then taper over 6 months

If not, then try CNI( cyclosporine vs tacrolimus)- goal 100-175 or 5-10 range for each drug
After 6 months, no response- considering MMF, anti cd20 agents but data on both is small. 

If secondary cause- treat the secondary cause or conservative management. SGLT2i may make it there next iteration. 

KDIGO 2021: GN Management Guidelines: Membranous Nephropathy

MN management has changed in 2020 onwards thanks to two trials published in 2020-2021 that showed that cyclophosphamide/steroids is superior and rituximab is not the main player yet. 
The figures below summarize the main points of the GN 2021 KDIGO update 

KDIGO 2021: GN Management Guidelines: IgA nephropathy

 

The three figures from the recent KI GN update 2021 summarizes IgA nephropathy.

Basically, At this point, given negative studies for steroids, only thing we have that has strong evidence is conservative management. Interestingly, SGLT2i did not make it to the guidelines.  ACEI/ARB+ SGLT2i might be the best treatment options we have for IgA Nephropathy. 

The one place where immunosuppressive meds will help is Crescentic IgA nephropathy and IgA with MCD. 

Here is the final table on all meds and their data from KDIGO

Does immunosuppressive meds help IgA nephropathy? Do we await the budesonide directed therapy approval, do we await more supportive agents such as ET1 antagonists or Aldo antagonists? Time will tell. Till then, IgA nephropathy is still the hardest GN to treat as we don't have clear options for treating the pathophysiology of the disease. 

Hypocomplementemia and the Kidney

 When we are faced with AKI and classically low c3 and c4, certain diseases come to mind.

A classic figure that has been used for years is below:

I think we can divide the low complement diseases and the kidney with glomerular processes and non glomerular processes

The glomerular diseases that are classically associated with low complements are:

MPGN pattern( all forms, c3GN, DDD, immune complex related MPGN), Lupus related GN, Cyro related GN, infection associated GN( both post strep and endocarditis), but we should not forget Fibrillary GN ( especially if MPGN pattern of injury is noted) and heavy chain deposition disease(HCDD). Finally, we should not forget TMA with complement disorders can cause low c3 in some cases.  In other words, immune complex is the main pathology that is driving the hypocomplementemia. 

Non glomerular diseases that can be associated with low complements should be kept in mind- classically atheroembolic disease and IgG4 diseases( fair amount have low complements)

Here is a mnemonic that many use- CHAMPS ( created by NephSim)