Monday, October 12, 2015

In the News: Regenerative Medicine in Nephrology


Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major global public health problem.  In the US, about 11% of adults have CKD as of 2012, and CKD accounts for $41 billion in Medicare expenditures (17%).   When patients with CKD progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), the options for treatment are limited to dialysis and kidney transplantation.  Dialysis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and kidney transplantation is limited by the supply of organs as well as the need for patients to take immunosuppressive medications for the rest of their lives.  There is a need for new, innovative therapies to treat CKD and ESRD.  One promising approach is to rebuild or repair cells, tissues, or organs to restore proper function.  This exciting new area of medicine has been termed “Regenerative Medicine.” 

We have been working for the last seven years on developing strategies to differentiate human pluripotent stem cells, particularly human embryonic stem (ES) cells and human induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, into cells of the kidney lineage for the purposes of kidney regeneration and kidney disease modeling.  We believe that the successful derivation of functional kidney cells and structures from human pluripotent stem cells will have an enormous impact on a variety of clinical and translational applications, including kidney tissue bioengineering to replace lost kidney tissue, renal assist devices to treat acute and chronic kidney injury, drug toxicity screening, screening for novel therapeutic agents, and human kidney disease modeling.


Our primary goal was to develop a highly efficient, chemically defined method of differentiating human pluripotent stem cells into kidney tissue.  The normal kidney consists of approximately one million nephrons (the functional units of the kidney).  During normal kidney development, nephron progenitor cells (NPCs) give rise to nearly all the epithelial cells of nephrons.  Nephrons are highly complex structures with multiple segments, each of which performs a set of specific physiologic functions of the kidney such as salt and water regulation and waste product elimination.  While previous studies, including work from our own lab, have demonstrated the ability to generate NPCs from human pluripotent stem cells, efficiencies have been low.  Furthermore, while these NPCs have been able to differentiate into rudimentary structures of the nephron, none of the prior studies have demonstrated the ability to form a complete, mature nephron from NPCs.

We hypothesized that a much higher efficiency of NPC generation and formation of kidney units could be achieved by following nature’s normal differentiation pathway. We therefore set out to establish a differentiation protocol that would mimic the stages of nephron formation as closely as possible.  Our approach in recapitulating the steps of kidney development as precisely as possible resulted in a highly robust recipe for generation of kidney organoids. To our knowledge, this is the most efficient method for generating complex kidney structures from human pluripotent stem cells. The ability to do this using induced pluripotent stem cells, which are derived from skin or blood cells of patients, allows creation of kidney tissue without ethical concerns and allows the tissue to be “personalized”, that is, generated from a particular patient.  If in the future the tissue is re-implanted back into the patient, the immune response may then be very limited since the tissue will be recognized as self.


Finally, we tested our nephron organoids for the ability to model human kidney development and drug toxicity to the kidneys.  Kidney development is an important medical topic since it has been increasingly recognized that individuals can be born with fewer functional kidney units and these patients are plagued by an increased chance of hypertension and kidney disease in later life.  By altering the environment of the NPC-derived renal vesicles with drugs that are known to affect kidney development, we found that the proximal tubule structures are greatly affected. This finding indicated that the nephron organoids are usable for the study of human kidney development, for which no “ex vivo” models currently exist.  With this model system we have a tool to evaluate potential therapeutic agents.

In addition, we tested nephron organoids for drug toxicity.  The kidney organoids were treated with the nephrotoxicants gentamicin and cisplatin.  Both nephrotoxicants induced segment-specific injury to nephron structures within organoids in a pattern that is consistent with what is observed in the clinical setting.  Given the individual variation in drug sensitivity in humans, the generation of these nephron organoids from human iPSCs would enable drug testing in a patient-specific manner.

Kidneys are the most commonly transplanted organs, but demand far outweighs supply.  While the human kidney does have the capacity to repair itself after injury, it is not able to regenerate new nephrons, the individual functional units that make up the kidney. Human pluripotent stem cells are the only human cells we can grow in the laboratory with the potential to generate new functional kidney tissue. Previously, researchers have been able to differentiate pluripotent stem cells into heart, liver, pancreas, or nerve cells by adding certain chemicals, but it has been challenging to turn these stem cells into kidney. Using normal kidney development as a roadmap, we developed the most efficient method for converting human pluripotent stem cells into kidney stem cells that will give rise to nearly all the functional cells of the kidney. These kidney stem cells organize into mature kidney structures that resemble the structures found in a normal human kidney. This gives us hope that, one day, we might be able to create kidney tissues that could function in a human patient and would be 100% immunocompatible with that patient.

Ryuji Morizane, MD, PhD
Postdoctoral fellow, Renal Division, Brigham and WOmen's Hospital

Albert Q. Lam, MD
Associate Physician, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Joseph V. Bonventre, MD, PhD

Chief, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Wednesday, October 7, 2015

Consult Rounds: Cancer Drug induced Thrombotic microangiopathies

Cancer Drug induced TMA come in 2 variants

1.       Type 1 TMA:- onset is delayed, usually 6-12 months after starting therapy
Cumulative dose related
Clinically, could be permanent and irreversible renal damage
Would avoid rechallenge
High incidence of acute mortality and may require dialysis even after stopping agent
Thrombi in both arteriole and glomerular capillary
Examples: Mitomycin C and gemcitabine induced

2.       Type 2 TMA:- onset is more acute and only at time of initiation of agent.
Not dose related
High likelihood of recovery
Some evidence of safe rechallenge
Thrombi in glomerular capillary mainly
Patient and kidney survival excellent
Examples:  anti VEGF and TKI agents induced


Friday, October 2, 2015

Topic Discussion: CLL and the kidney

Classically, it's well know that infiltrative disease is seen with CLL and the kidney leading to AKI.
What other diseases can you see with CLL and the kidney?

A recent paper by The Leung group at Mayo discusses the Mayo clinic experience of CLL and monocloncal B cell lymphocytosis patients that had a kidney biopsy.

Most common findings:
20% had MPGN
12% had infiltration of CLL
12% had TMA from chemotherapy -- classically related to pentostatin
10% had Minimal change disease

Other less commonly observed findings were AIN, AL lamda amyloidosis, light chain cast nephropathy, membranous GN and mesangial proliferative GN.

Other unrelated biopsy findings were diabetic nephropathy, obesity related FSGS, and HTN nephropathy.


Thursday, October 1, 2015

Topic Discussion: Non Dilated Obstructive Uropathy

Anuric renal failure has very few causes. The top three are usually: hydronephrosis, hydronephrosis and hydronephrosis! But sometimes, it’s the sonogram and imaging that sways you away from the diagnosis. The sonogram reads- no hydronephrosis and or dilatation.  But clinically, the only thing that makes sense to you is obstruction? What do you do then?

Non dilated obstruction is not uncommon especially in patients with cancer that effects the retroperitoneal regions. There is so much cancer mass that there is no ROOM for the kidney to expand. But doesn’t mean that hydronephrosis is not present. The syndrome of non-dilated obstructive uropathy (NDOU) and AKI is well reported. However, the literature suggests that this syndrome is rare, accounting for less than 5% of cases of urinary obstruction.

One of the earlier studies had looked at a series of patients at a single center and found that most common cause of these type of situations were cancers ( likely RP related)- so prostate, colon, bladder, lymphomas and other series have found cervical cancer as well.  Antegrade urography had found the obstruction in all of the cases in that one series. 

The first ever case of this was described by Ormand in 1948 with someone with retroperitoneal fibrosis.

A more recent study from Mayo Clinic has a case series of 3 cases. Despite the absence of dilatation on renal imaging, strong suspicion for NDOU led to decompression procedures with prompt recovery of kidney function in all three patients - two required percutaneous nephrostomy tube placements and/or ureteric stents and one responded to simple Foley catheter drainage. Here is another case series summarizing the data.

Treatment is usually diagnostic.  Given the pathology and the cause of the obstruction being present after the ureteral stents are placed, they usually only temporize the treatment. Percutaneous nephrostomy is usually the best procedure in such situations. 


When one encounters such cases, Urology and IR help is critical in getting the right diagnosis and prompt treatment.  

Thursday, September 24, 2015

TOPIC DISCUSSION: MEMS and ESRD

The NYHA heart failure patients have a new device that is useful in predicting their volume status. A Lancet article in 2013 showed that this device called the CARDIOMEMS ( implantable hemodynamic monitoring).  This big study showed that it reduced hospitalizations of heart failure patients.  This device measures the pulmonary artery pressures (PAP) via remote monitoring.  The device is placed via interventional means and the remote box predicts the PAP. Based on that the physician can assess volume status and increase or decrease diuretics or give fluids preventing inpatient visits. 
The holy grail of ESRD patients has been the dry weight and how do we know they are more volume overloaded or need more UF.   MEMS or microelectromechanical systems can perhaps play a major role in renal care.  MEMS offers a potential to predict volume status in ESRD patients.  The current use of drt weight comes with fluctuations, errors and not much reliability.  This device could be planted in HD patients and perhaps we could remotely monitor their fluid status and call for extra UF sessions, or remove less fluid and so forth and perhaps even prevent hospitalizations.  
What an amazing achievement by the cardiologists.
cardioMEMS

Monday, September 14, 2015

Onconephrology CME: Sept 26th one day symposium: First of it's kind

One last push for a plug in for the first ever one day CME on onconephrology.  It's ASN, ISN, NKF and C-KIN endorsed event.  

We are conducting a one day symposium on OncoNephrology: Cancer, chemotherapy and the Kidney at Hofstra NSLIJ School of Medicine on Sept 26th, 2015 from 7:30AM to 4PM
The conference will highlight and review the latest happenings in OncoNephrology

WHY to attend:

1. First of it's kind in USA to focus on this topic
2. We shall be using innovative technology to allow for a fun and interactive conference( polleverywhere, joinme and so forth)
3. A chance to win few nephrology textbooks as a raffle during the day
4. FREE to attend for any trainee ( student, fellows or residents)
5. Live tweeting of conference will be available via AJKDblog


Talks and Speakers highlighted;

AKI in Cancer Patients;  Joseph Bonventre, Harvard Medical School
Chemotherapy Toxicities:  Mark Perazella, Yale University
Targeted Therapy and the Kidney: Kenar Jhaveri, Hofstra University
Hypercalcemia of Malignancy: Naveed Masani, Winthrop University
Anemia, CKD, ESKD and cancer: Steven Fishbane, Hofstra University
Renal Cancer, an update: Thomas Bradley, Hofstra University, NSLIJ Cancer Institute
Paraneoplastic GN; Hitesh H Shah, Hofstra University
TMA:  Bradley Dixon, Cincinnati Children Hospital
Post Kidney Transplant Cancers: Vinay Nair, Mt Sinai Medical Center
Paraproteinemias, an update: Gerald Appel, Columbia University Medical Center
Cases with the Onconephropathologist: Glen Markowitz, Columbia Medical Center

Course directors:  Kenar Jhaveri, Steven Fishbane and Thomas Bradley( Division of Nephrology and Hematology/Oncology at Hofstra NSLIJ School of Medicine)
Planning committee: Kenar Jhaveri, Steven Fishbane and Thomas Bradley, Hitesh H Shah, Pravin Singhal, Jyotsana Thakkar and Rimda Wanchoo( all from Division of Nephrology, Hofstra NSLIJ School of Medicine)

To Register: go here

Sunday, September 13, 2015

TOPIC DISCUSSION: Mnemonic for toxins that are removed by hemodialysis

Toxins that are removed by hemodialysis

Here is a mnemonic I found online

I   STUMBLE

I = Isopropanol
S= Salicylates
T = Theophyline
U = Uremia
M= Methanol
B= Barbituates, beta blockers (water soluble ones such as atenolol)
L= Lithium
E= Ethylene glycol

Source: http://crashingpatient.com/toxicology/general-toxicology-random-drugs.htm/

All Posts

Search This Blog